Anthropic brings Mythos 5 to its Claude Security vulnerability scanner
Earlier this year, Anthropic launched Claude Security, an enterprise tool that helps development teams scan their codebase for security vulnerabilities The post Anthropic brings Mythos 5 to its Claude Security vulnerability scanner appeared first on The New Stack.
Earlier this year, Anthropic launched Claude Security, an enterprise tool that helps development teams scan their codebase for security vulnerabilities The post Anthropic brings Mythos 5 to its Claude Security vulnerability scanner appeared first on The New Stack.
In context
- Topic: Low-Code y No-Code — Plataformas de bajo código, su gobierno y su deuda técnica.
- Source: The New Stack
- Published: 21/08/2026
Continue reading at the original source →
Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.
Why it matters
Every time I read a case like this I think the same thing: security is not bought, it is operated. You can own every tool on the market and remain exposed if nobody reviews the alerts, if patches get applied when there is time, or if the backup was never tested by actually restoring it.
I read it with the same short list as always: second factor on anything that grants access, tested backups kept off the network, and a real inventory of what is exposed to the internet. It is not glamorous, and it still prevents most disasters.
What usually goes wrong
What I see fail most is the backup. It is configured, it runs every night, nobody checks it. The day you need to restore, it turns out it had been failing silently for four months, or that everything was backed up except exactly what was needed. A backup never restored is an assumption.
What to watch
- How long it took to detect, usually the most revealing metric in the whole case.
- Whether initial access came from a legitimate account handled badly, which is the most frequent pattern.
- What could be restored and how fast — a backup that was never tested does not count.
How I read this entry
If this happened near an organisation I advise, the conversation I would force is not about tools. It is about the rehearsal. How many times the incident was simulated, who calls whom, what gets said to customers and when. A plan never rehearsed is not a plan, it is a document.
This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Living through this in your own team?
Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.