ERA Group alerta de cómo "puede afectar al flujo de caja, a la capacidad operativa y a la estabilidad financiera de cualquier organización".
ERA Group alerta de cómo "puede afectar al flujo de caja, a la capacidad operativa y a la estabilidad financiera de cualquier organización".
En contexto
- Tema: Estrategia y Gobierno de TI — Decisiones de portafolio, costo total, gobierno y marcos de referencia.
- Fuente: Silicon España
- Publicado: 21/08/2026
Seguir leyendo en la fuente original →
Extracto publicado automáticamente por el radar del sitio. El texto completo pertenece a su medio y se enlaza arriba.
Why it matters
Every time I read a case like this I think the same thing: security is not bought, it is operated. You can own every tool on the market and remain exposed if nobody reviews the alerts, if patches get applied when there is time, or if the backup was never tested by actually restoring it.
I separate technical risk from business risk, because they do not always match. A critical vulnerability in an isolated system matters less than a medium one in the system that issues invoices. Prioritising by severity without looking at where the money is is an expensive way to work hard and protect little.
What usually goes wrong
Where it usually breaks is response, not prevention. There are tools, there are alerts, and when something real happens nobody knows who decides to disconnect, who gets called first, or what the customer is told. Valuable hours get lost arguing about that while the problem grows.
What to watch
- How it was communicated to customers and regulators, which is where reputational cost is decided.
- Whether third parties or suppliers were in the chain, because the perimeter now includes partners.
- How long it took to detect, usually the most revealing metric in the whole case.
How I read this entry
I would use it for a conversation with the board, not with the technical team. The question you must be able to answer there is how long the business can operate without its systems and what each day of that outage costs. With that number, the security budget gets discussed differently.
The original story is published in another language; the excerpt is quoted as the publisher delivers it and the commentary is written in English.
Living through this in your own team?
Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.
