Financial services industry publishes roadmap for equity issuance electronification

In a step towards the first fully electronic IPO, the FIX Trading Community (FIX) and the Investment Association (IA), have published an industry best practice framework to support the modernisation of equity capital raising processes.

In a step towards the first fully electronic IPO, the FIX Trading Community (FIX) and the Investment Association (IA), have published an industry best practice framework to support the modernisation of equity capital raising processes.

In context

• Topic: Banca y Fintech — Banca digital, pagos, open banking y regulación financiera.
• Source: Finextra
• Published: 25/08/2026

Continue reading at the original source →

Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.

Why it matters

Financial services has one characteristic that makes it unlike every other sector: it can fail on experience and survive, but it cannot fail on trust. That is why moves that look slow from the outside are usually prudent from the inside.

I read these stories with two questions on top: what happens to cost per transaction and what happens to risk. If cost drops but risk rises without anybody measuring it, the saving is borrowed and gets repaid with interest on the day of the first incident.

What usually goes wrong

The mistake that repeats is testing only the happy path. It gets validated that the transaction works, not that the reversal works, that duplicates are caught, that a power cut mid-operation leaves everything consistent. Those cases are ninety per cent of the real work and ten per cent of the testing.

What to watch

• What happens to cost per transaction at real volume, which is where the business is decided.
• How daily reconciliation is left, which is where the cases nobody modelled show up.
• What the local regulator requires and by when, because the deadline is usually the real constraint.

How I read this entry

What I would ask for before approving something like this is the plan for when it fails: how the customer gets their money back, in what timeframe, who authorises it and what they are told meanwhile. In payments, the quality of the recovery matters more than the quality of the happy path.

This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.