AI agents for business automation (with 27 AI agent examples)
Long before Zapier hired me to write for them, I was already a power user. I loved tinkering with automations and watching tasks take care of themselves. But as much as I leaned on those workflows, I always wished they could not only do work for me but also make decisions along the way.
Long before Zapier hired me to write for them, I was already a power user. I loved tinkering with automations and watching tasks take care of themselves. But as much as I leaned on those workflows, I always wished they could not only do work for me but also make decisions along the way.
In context
- Topic: Low-Code y No-Code — Plataformas de bajo código, su gobierno y su deuda técnica.
- Source: Zapier Blog
- Published: 14/09/2026
Continue reading at the original source →
Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.
Why it matters
Low-code changed who is allowed to build, and that is the real story. When someone in operations can assemble their own flow without going through IT, the organisation gains speed and inherits a new problem: nobody knows how many of those flows exist or who depends on them.
I read it thinking about who is left in charge. A flow gets built by one person in an afternoon; keeping it alive is a commitment measured in years. If it is not clear who reviews it when the system on the other side changes, you are creating operational debt dressed up as an improvement.
What usually goes wrong
The frequent mistake is automating the exception instead of the common case. A flow gets built full of conditions to cover the odd cases, and that complexity makes it impossible to maintain. Automating the first eighty per cent well and leaving the rest to a person is usually the better deal.
What to watch
- What happens when the system on the other side changes, because it will change without warning.
- Cost per run at real volume, which on these platforms scales fast and surprises people.
- How the flow reports failure, and to whom: without that, the error gets discovered by the customer.
How I read this entry
If this were adopted in an organisation, I would ask from day one for a simple register: which flows exist, who built them, which systems they touch, and who to call when they fail. It costs an afternoon to set up and avoids the scenario where nobody knows what broke.
This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Comments
No comments yet. Yours can be the first.
Living through this in your own team?
Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.
