Back to the radar Artificial Intelligence

Divergência sobre supervisão de IA nas empresas

Artificial Intelligence

Uma pesquisa da TeamViewer aponta para uma desconexão dentro das empresas em relação ao uso da inteligência artificial, segundo comunicado da companhia. O estudo, realizado entre abril e maio de 2026 em nove mercados, incluindo o Brasil, mostra que profissionais ligados às operações impulsionadas por IA desejam mais su…

Uma pesquisa da TeamViewer aponta para uma desconexão dentro das empresas em relação ao uso da inteligência artificial, segundo comunicado da companhia. O estudo, realizado entre abril e maio de 2026 em nove mercados, incluindo o Brasil, mostra que profissionais ligados às operações impulsionadas por IA desejam mais su…

Em contexto

  • Tema: Inteligencia Artificial — IA aplicada al negocio: casos, límites, costos y gobierno.
  • Fonte: CISO Advisor
  • Publicado: 10/10/2026

Continuar lendo na fonte original →

Trecho publicado automaticamente pelo radar do site. O texto completo pertence ao veículo e está vinculado acima.

Why it matters

The conversation about artificial intelligence has become noisy, and that makes it harder to see what matters. What matters is rarely the model. It is which concrete process ends up cheaper, faster or more reliable, and who is accountable when the answer comes out wrong.

I always separate two things that get mixed up: the demo and the operation. A demo needs to work once with someone watching. An operation needs to work a thousand times with nobody watching, with odd cases, dirty data, at two in the morning. The gap between the two is where the budget goes.

What usually goes wrong

The point where it usually breaks is the handover to operations. The team that built the pilot knows how to read the results; the team receiving it does not. Without training and written criteria, people start accepting everything the model says or ignoring it entirely, and both are equally expensive.

What to watch

  • Which concrete process is touched and how it is measured before and after; with no baseline there is no result, only opinion.
  • Who reviews the model outputs and how often — the point at which AI becomes auditable.
  • Cost per query at real volume, not pilot volume: the variable that produces the most surprises.

How I read this entry

My practical advice is to fix on day one what happens when the model is wrong: who reviews, how often, and at what point it gets switched off. It sounds defensive, but it is exactly what lets you be aggressive later, because the risk stopped being an unknown.

The original story is published in another language; the excerpt is quoted as the publisher delivers it and the commentary is written in English.
Share

Comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Plain text only, no links. No email is requested. Comments are reviewed before they are published.

Living through this in your own team?

Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.

Keep reading

More entries from the radar

See all
Darinel Ortega Online · I reply during the day
Today
Hello. I'm not selling anything here: this is for exchanging knowledge about technology.
Write whatever you like — you can send text, images or documents. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

An open conversation to share knowledge. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

Let us book a conversation

Pick the day and time that work for you. Thirty minutes, no sales pitch.

Video call

For a video call, just ask for one here and I'll send you the session link.