InfoQ Online Cohorts Address AI Security and Coding Agent Verification
A look at two InfoQ online certification cohorts covering security and privacy decisions in production AI systems and the verification needed when coding agents work in existing codebases. By Artenisa Chatziou
A look at two InfoQ online certification cohorts covering security and privacy decisions in production AI systems and the verification needed when coding agents work in existing codebases. By Artenisa Chatziou
In context
- Topic: Desarrollo con IA — Copilotos y agentes en el ciclo de desarrollo de software.
- Source: InfoQ
- Published: 30/09/2026
Continue reading at the original source →
Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.
Why it matters
When a tool appears promising faster development, the useful question is not how much code it generates but how much work it generates downstream. Tests, review, security, technical debt, incidents: that is where the promise gets paid or charged.
I distinguish between accelerating an experienced developer and accelerating someone just starting. In the first case the tool multiplies judgement; in the second it multiplies the lack of it. Adoption policy has to acknowledge that difference or the codebase fills with plausible, wrong code.
What usually goes wrong
What usually goes wrong is that review does not grow at the same rate as production. The team generates twice as much and still has the same two people reviewing, who get tired, start approving faster, and three months later quality has dropped without any indicator showing it yet.
What to watch
- What happens to code review: if the assistant produces more, somebody has to read more.
- What happens to tests — generating code without generating tests only moves the problem forward.
- Where the source code travels when the assistant is used, and what the contract says about it.
How I read this entry
If I were rolling this out, I would do it with written rules: what can be generated, what always gets human eyes, and what is off limits to an assistant — typically anything handling money, identity or personal data. Rules give freedom, they do not remove it.
This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Comments
No comments yet. Yours can be the first.
Living through this in your own team?
Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.
