A Microsoft publicou nesta segunda-feira (19) um conjunto de recursos para controlar agentes de inteligência artificial que atuam dentro das organizações. O anúncio foi feito por Nadim Abdo, vice-presidente corporativo de Identity and Network Access da Microsoft, em texto no blog da empresa.
A Microsoft publicou nesta segunda-feira (19) um conjunto de recursos para controlar agentes de inteligência artificial que atuam dentro das organizações. O anúncio foi feito por Nadim Abdo, vice-presidente corporativo de Identity and Network Access da Microsoft, em texto no blog da empresa.
Em contexto
- Tema: Inteligencia Artificial — IA aplicada al negocio: casos, límites, costos y gobierno.
- Fonte: CISO Advisor
- Publicado: 19/10/2026
Continuar lendo na fonte original →
Trecho publicado automaticamente pelo radar do site. O texto completo pertence ao veículo e está vinculado acima.
Why it matters
Adopting AI in a company is less like buying software and more like hiring someone. You have to teach it the context, review its work at the start, and define what it can sign off alone and what it cannot. The stories worth reading are the ones showing somebody solving that part, not the announcement part.
I measure AI maturity with an uncomfortable question: can anyone explain, in one line, what decision the model makes and who answers if it gets it wrong? Where that is clear, the project moves. Where it is not, it stays in permanent pilot and gets cancelled with the excuse that the technology was not ready.
What usually goes wrong
The point where it usually breaks is the handover to operations. The team that built the pilot knows how to read the results; the team receiving it does not. Without training and written criteria, people start accepting everything the model says or ignoring it entirely, and both are equally expensive.
What to watch
- Cost per query at real volume, not pilot volume: the variable that produces the most surprises.
- Where the data ends up and under what contract, especially when customer information is involved.
- Whether the organisation can change provider without rebuilding everything, which is the proof it did not get locked in.
How I read this entry
I would use it for a talent conversation rather than a purchasing one. The capability that needs installing is not operating a tool, which changes every six months, but framing the problem well and judging the answer. That one stays in the house.
The original story is published in another language; the excerpt is quoted as the publisher delivers it and the commentary is written in English.
Comments
No comments yet. Yours can be the first.
Living through this in your own team?
Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.
