Power Platform Build hands-on Power Platform and AI expertise with Power Series Developed by the Power CAT team, Power Series is now available with 20 hands-on labs that help customers, partners, and field teams build practical Power Platform and AI skills at their own pace.
Power Platform Build hands-on Power Platform and AI expertise with Power Series Developed by the Power CAT team, Power Series is now available with 20 hands-on labs that help customers, partners, and field teams build practical Power Platform and AI skills at their own pace.
In context
- Topic: Low-Code y No-Code — Plataformas de bajo código, su gobierno y su deuda técnica.
- Source: Microsoft Power Platform
- Published: 17/09/2026
Continue reading at the original source →
Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.
Why it matters
Automation has a well known trap: automating a bad process only means getting it wrong faster and at greater scale. Before connecting two systems it is worth asking whether the step being automated should exist at all.
I read it thinking about who is left in charge. A flow gets built by one person in an afternoon; keeping it alive is a commitment measured in years. If it is not clear who reviews it when the system on the other side changes, you are creating operational debt dressed up as an improvement.
What usually goes wrong
Where it usually goes wrong is permissions. To make the flow work, an account with broad access gets created because that is the quick path, and that account stays there forever with no owner and no review. It is the most common back door I find when auditing an automated operation.
What to watch
- Cost per run at real volume, which on these platforms scales fast and surprises people.
- How the flow reports failure, and to whom: without that, the error gets discovered by the customer.
- How many flows already exist and who maintains them, which is where the invisible debt shows up.
How I read this entry
If this were adopted in an organisation, I would ask from day one for a simple register: which flows exist, who built them, which systems they touch, and who to call when they fail. It costs an afternoon to set up and avoids the scenario where nobody knows what broke.
This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Comments
No comments yet. Yours can be the first.
Living through this in your own team?
Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.
