Back to the radar Low-Code and No-Code

Your AI transformation starts with what you’ve already built

Low-Code and No-Code

See how Power Apps, Power Platform, and Copilot Studio are helping teams transform ideas into AI-powered business solutions at PPCC 2026. The post Your AI transformation starts with what you’ve already built appeared first on Microsoft Power Platform Blog.

See how Power Apps, Power Platform, and Copilot Studio are helping teams transform ideas into AI-powered business solutions at PPCC 2026. The post Your AI transformation starts with what you’ve already built appeared first on Microsoft Power Platform Blog.

In context

  • Topic: Low-Code y No-Code — Plataformas de bajo código, su gobierno y su deuda técnica.
  • Source: Microsoft Power Platform
  • Published: 01/10/2026

Continue reading at the original source →

Excerpt published automatically by the site radar. The full text belongs to its publisher and is linked above.

Why it matters

Low-code changed who is allowed to build, and that is the real story. When someone in operations can assemble their own flow without going through IT, the organisation gains speed and inherits a new problem: nobody knows how many of those flows exist or who depends on them.

I judge these tools by what happens the day they fail. An automated flow that breaks silently is worse than no flow, because nobody finds out until the customer complains. The first thing I ask is not what it integrates with, but how it tells you when it could not.

What usually goes wrong

Where it usually goes wrong is permissions. To make the flow work, an account with broad access gets created because that is the quick path, and that account stays there forever with no owner and no review. It is the most common back door I find when auditing an automated operation.

What to watch

  • What happens when the system on the other side changes, because it will change without warning.
  • Cost per run at real volume, which on these platforms scales fast and surprises people.
  • How the flow reports failure, and to whom: without that, the error gets discovered by the customer.

How I read this entry

If this were adopted in an organisation, I would ask from day one for a simple register: which flows exist, who built them, which systems they touch, and who to call when they fail. It costs an afternoon to set up and avoids the scenario where nobody knows what broke.

This entry is an excerpt from the original source, selected by the site radar. The commentary above is the site's own and does not belong to the cited publisher.
Share

Comments

No comments yet. Yours can be the first.

Plain text only, no links. No email is requested. Comments are reviewed before they are published.

Living through this in your own team?

Open the chat and tell me how you're handling it. I'm interested in comparing notes.

Keep reading

More entries from the radar

See all
Darinel Ortega Online · I reply during the day
Today
Hello. I'm not selling anything here: this is for exchanging knowledge about technology.
Write whatever you like — you can send text, images or documents. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

An open conversation to share knowledge. Messages reach my console and I reply from there.

Let us book a conversation

Pick the day and time that work for you. Thirty minutes, no sales pitch.

Video call

For a video call, just ask for one here and I'll send you the session link.